Showing posts with label critical thinking. Show all posts
Showing posts with label critical thinking. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 15, 2026

The Bible Verse People Use to End Every Argument (Dan McClellan and Dan Beecher; Data Over Dogma podcast on YouTube)

This episode it's Twisted Scripture: Proverbs 3:5–6 — "trust in the Lord and lean not on your own understanding" — and the way it gets wielded to shut a conversation down. 

We dig into the claim that you can only "really" understand the Bible if you read it with the Holy Spirit, why that's textbook special pleading, and how John Lennox's red Ferrari ends up parked in the same garage as Carl Sagan's invisible dragon. 

Along the way: intuition versus reflective cognition, why every tradition reports the same spiritual "confirmation," and the difference between private faith and public claims.

Chapters:

0:00 Intro
1:15 Twisted Scripture Begins
1:50 Proverbs 3:5–6
3:05 "I Read With the Spirit"
4:18 Special Pleading
6:18 Slavery as the Test Case
7:23 What the Commentary Says
8:19 Hidden From the Wise
9:19 Whose Spirit Is Right?
10:03 Intuition vs. Reflection
11:46 The Unreliable Brain
14:24 The Problem of Qualia
16:22 Lennox's Red Ferrari
17:24 Sagan's Garage Dragon
19:41 Feelings vs. Evidence
20:28 Every Tradition Feels It
23:47 The Thought-Stopping Cliché
25:01 Private Faith, Public Claims
27:10 "The Spirit Told Me"
28:41 More Trump-Card Verses
29:51 Data Over Dogma
Interview: 

Sunday, March 29, 2026

Why Christianity Hates Indigenous People (Drew McCoy/Genetically Modified Skeptic on YouTube)

No Piraha has ever been converted to Christianity, despite 242 years of missions. 

Join FFRF to protect separation of church and state: https://ffrf.org/misc-for-landing-pages/join-ffrf-today/ 

The indigenous critique of Christianity was one of the most influential factors in the development of the European Enlightenment.
Interview: 

Monday, March 9, 2026

LIVE DEBATE [The Christmas Story is a Lie] 12-23-2025 (DZ Debates on YouTube)

The bible can't figure out when Jesus was born, where he lived, confused Greek and Hebrew texts, and lies about his genealogy.
Interview: 
TIMESTAMPS
  • 16:23 John [Friendly] - A follower of Doug 
  • 31:12 JD - Was Isaiah 7 taking about a virgin birth? 
  • 43:00 Pat [Deconstructing] - Fear of Hell; Preterism, the Second Coming, and Jeremiah 33 
  • 1:11:40 (Pat) If all of this isn’t real and Paul is crazy, what was the point of what they were doing in the New Testament? How do you find meaning outside religion? 
  • 1:38:08 Jonathon - Caller just bounces around; Was the virgin birth an actual prophecy? Who authored the Gospels and are they reliable? What did Paul experience? 
  • 1:56:00 (Jonathon) - Was Matthew an eyewitness and did he know Hebrew? Did Jesus fulfill Zechariah 9? Was the snake Satan in the Garden of Eden? 
  • 2:18:20 (Jonathon) - What does “seed” mean in Galatians 3 when Paul is quoting another text? Is Jeremiah 31 about Jesus? 
  • 3:07:10 Bryan [Friendly] - Jesus is a clone of Mary Skipped a few short, friendly calls 
  • 3:23:33 JC - Discussion on the virgin birth; Caller is dropped because he wasn’t of age 3:35:58 Superchats and wrap-up 4:17:50 Justin’s mug he submitted to The Line’s mug brawl contest

A Psychologist LAUGHS at my Resurrection Hypothesis (Nick Meader response) (Paulogia on YouTube)

Nick Meader joined InspiringPhilosophy to discuss his new book, "Resurrection: Extraordinary Evidence for an Extraordinary Claim" and to pick-apart my Minimal Witnesses hypothesis for the origin of Christianity.
Interview: 

Sunday, March 8, 2026

Kirk Cameron Caught Hell for Exposing Christianity’s Biggest Problem (20+ Apologist Response) (Paulogia on YouTube)

Kirk Cameron opened a can of worms… and Christian YouTube exploded. I’m responding to over 25 reaction videos in one breakdown, examining the verses, the contradictions, and the moral problem at the heart of the hell debate. Eternal torment or annihilation? Both can’t be true — but could both be wrong?
Interview: 

Tuesday, September 23, 2025

Randi Weingarten on Defending Our Public Education (Al Franken podcast)

We are joined by Randi Weingarten, the President of the American Federation of Teachers, to discuss her new book, Why Fascists Fear Teachers: Public Education and the Future of Democracy.

In the book, Weingarten details how there has been a systematic demonization of teachers and public education in America. She argues that one of the pillars of public education is critical thinking, which prevents fascism from flourishing in society – so fascists (and wannabe fascists) hate it.

We explore a variety of topics facing schoolchildren and their parents today, including charter schools, artificial intelligence, phones in schools, and the treatment of LGBTQ+ students.

We also discuss Trump’s proposed elimination of the Department of Education, attacks on teachers unions, and how we may have kept the schools closed for too long during Covid-19.

READ Randi‘s new book: https://sites.prh.com/whyfascistsfearteachers
Interview: 


Friday, June 13, 2025

How to know what’s true • Richard Carrier Blogs

In this blog post, Dr. Richard Carrier details how to tell what's true, using methods that can be applied to any claims.  In this example, he works out a response to anti-vaxxers: On the Strange Idea That Viruses Don't Exist.

Quoting from his blog post:

I want to impart to you some advice for dealing with any claims in that domain, because there are three "dirty tricks" that all cranks like anti-vaxxers pull that you can look for to catch this happening every time, so you can vet these things yourself and not need someone like me to:

  1. They will cite papers that (i) don't actually say what they claim, or (ii) don't actually imply what they claim, or (iii) have been retracted or refuted by subsequent, higher-powered studies, or (iv) have never been independently replicated while the contrary finding has been. This is dishonest and manipulative. So anyone whose argument is mostly built this way is either (a) a liar you should never trust again, or (b) their gullible victim, whose judgment on this matter you shouldn't trust until they get up to speed. And (b) you might be able to help. But for (a), just walk and block.
  2. They will make claims you can prove false with ten minutes of effort, and which when thus eliminated, fatally cripple their argument, calling their conclusion (and their competence) into sufficient doubt to walk away (see my Primer on Actually Doing Your Own Research). Don't play their game of having to rebut "everything" they say. A single fatality to their argument is enough to identify it all as a waste of your time; but three is decisive. Any ensuing whining and raging is just emotional manipulation at that point. You don't owe them any more of your time. You can just walk and block.
  3. They will make arguments that you can immediately identify as fallacious, and which when thus eliminated, fatally cripple their argument. Here, maybe, they can "fix" the argument, and all they have demonstrated is that they are bad at thinking. Which is not a good sign. But you can give them a chance. Though they only get three. Third strike and they're out. You then know they cannot think. And if they cannot think, nothing they do think is worth the bother of your listening to. Walk and block.

Those three tactics are common to all pseudoscience and every implausible conspiracy, so it's good advice all around. Whether it's flat earth, lizard people, or climate denial. Or, indeed, even Christianity or Islam or woo—or MAGA.

  


https://www.richardcarrier.info/archives/35080








Click Older Posts above to see more.